Monday, 21 March 2016

Could this machine be the answer to global warming?

A Weizmann professor and an entrepreneur have patented a device that extracts carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and turns it into fuel. They say it has the potential to save life on our planet.
if  this past summer felt hot to you, it’s not your imagination. Meteorologistspredict that 2015 will end up being the hottest year on record. There isscientific consensus that the culprit is global warming, caused by carbon dioxide emissions.
Nevertheless, global warming is a hairtrigger issue and that’s because combustion, the chemical reaction responsible for modern industry, produces carbon dioxide (CO2), and carbon dioxide produces global warming. It’s a fact of nature that we can’t wish away, yet we’re unwilling to give up the modern comforts of electricity, automobiles, skyscrapers and advanced technology. Humanity is caught in a tragedy of its own making — our greatest achievements could soon lead to our biological extinction.

“Our bodies absorb oxygen and combine it with the food we eat to produce energy. We emit carbon dioxide when we breathe. But the carbon dioxide breathed out by animals is absorbed by plants and trees. Using the energy of the sun, they convert it back into carbon (carbohydrates) which makes their trunk and branches, and they emit oxygen back into the atmosphere.”
This natural balance, says Banitt, was first disturbed when our human ancestors made fire, combining the carbon in firewood with oxygen in the air to produce energy and CO2. But the amounts of excess CO2 were very small and nature adjusted itself.
Once we started burning coal and oil, however, there were not enough plants to absorb all the excess CO2.
“The quantities are immense. At present humanity is emitting 40 billion tons of CO2 per year above the natural balance. The problem is that CO2 gas emitted into the atmosphere creates a kind of blanket that prevents heat from leaving the atmosphere to go into space, and this is causing temperatures to rise slowly, which is climate change.”
About twenty years ago, says Banitt, scientists developed technologies to capture up to 90 percent of CO2 emissions before they hit the atmosphere.
“But the technology is expensive, and then you have 40 billion tons of carbon dioxide each year. What do you do with it? The original idea was to bury it in geological formations, but that’s like setting a bomb to go off 200 years from now.”
Indeed, some scientists argue that burying carbon dioxide can trigger earthquakes and that even a small earthquake can cause leaks that will defeat the purpose of the burial.
According to Banitt, there are a handful of companies worldwide that allow you to do something useful with the carbon dioxide you’ve captured. New CO2 Fuels allows you to get rid of the carbon dioxide and make money in the process.
“We basically recycle the carbon dioxide.”
What New CO2 Fuels does is reverse the combustion process. It takes CO2 and extracts the oxygen by injecting energy into it.
“We extract the oxygen — which is a good product in its own right. We’re left with carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrogen. That’s a gas known as syngas (synthetic gas) and there are lots of people around the world who know how to convert it into methanol, ethanol, gasoline, kerosene ammonia, urea, plastics, you name it.”
Where do you get the energy to do this?
“We can take it from the sun. And there are many industries producing a lot of heat that gets wasted. For instance, steel mills burn a lot of coal and gas to melt the ore. It’s the same with glass, cement and other metals.”
Bannit says it’s a no-brainer for a steel mill to use his technology.
“You have a lot of heat that you’re wasting. You have a lot of CO2 that the regulator is pressuring you to reduce. Instead of wasting both of them, put them into our system and generate fuel, plastic or fertilizers.”
Yes, but if people go out and burn those fuels how are you reducing CO2 emissions?
“Imagine a steel plant that emits 10 million tons of CO2 per year. The plant is next to a town with 20,000 cars that emit another million tons of CO2 per year. Instead of buying oil from the oil company, the city can buy fuel from the steel mill which it generated using its heat and CO2. Previously, you had 11 million tons of carbon dioxide emissions. Now you take a million tons of CO2 from the steel mill and convert it back to fuel. So you only have 10 million tons of emissions.”

Sunday, 20 March 2016

Save Water

✊ Height of Innovation ✊
💧 SAVE WATER 💧

Saturday, 19 March 2016

We all fall down #WakeUpSaveTheWorld


We're moving fast and living large,
Forgetting Mother Nature's in charge.
Amazed when rings our bell,
Sending us through living hell.

Friday, 11 March 2016

Low Arctic sea ice extent

February continues streak of record low Arctic sea ice extent
Arctic sea ice extent for February 2016 was 14.22 million square kilometers (5.48 million square miles). The magenta line shows the 1981 to 2010 median extent for that month. The black cross indicates the geographic North Pole. Credit: National Snow and Ice Data Center.

Arctic sea ice was at a satellite-record low for the second month in a row. The first three weeks of February saw little ice growth, but extent rose during the last week of the month. Arctic sea ice typically reaches its maximum extent for the year in mid to late March.
Arctic sea ice extent for February averaged 14.22 million square kilometers (5.48 million square miles), the lowest February extent in the satellite record. It is 1.16 million square kilometers (448,000 square miles) below the 1981 to 2010 long-term average of 15.4 million square kilometers (5.94 million square miles) and is 200,000 square kilometers (77,000 square miles) below the previous record low for the month recorded in 2005.
The first three weeks of February saw little ice growth, but extent rose during the last week of the month primarily due to growth in the Sea of Okhotsk (180,000 square kilometers or 70,000 square miles) and to a lesser extent in Baffin Bay (35,000 square kilometers or 13,500 square miles). Extent is presently below average in the Barents and Kara seas, as well as the Bering Sea and the East Greenland Sea. Extent decreased in the Barents and East Greenland seas during the month of February. In other regions, such as the Sea of Okhotsk, Baffin Bay, and the Labrador Sea, ice conditions are near average to slightly above average for this time of year. An exception is the Gulf of St. Lawrence, which remains largely ice free.
In the Antarctic, sea ice reached its minimum extent for the year on February 19, averaging 2.6 million square kilometers (1 million square miles). It is the ninth lowest Antarctic sea ice minimum extent in the satellite record.
Monthly February sea ice extent for 1979 to 2016 shows a decline of 3.0 percent per decade. Credit: National Snow and Ice Data Center.

Monday, 7 March 2016

Do trees communicate with each other?

Do trees communicate with each other?


Surprisingly, the answer is yes.
They might seem like the strong, tall and silent type, but trees actually communicate with each other. Many Forest ecologist, studies a type of fungi that forms underground communication networks between trees.
Big old trees — dubbed 'mother trees' — are hubs in this mycorrhizal fungal network, playing a key role in supporting other trees in the forest, especially their offspring.
"We found that the biggest oldest trees had more connections to other trees than smaller trees. It stands to reason because they have more root systems," 
Fungal networks also boost their host plants' immune systems. That's because, when a fungus colonizes the roots of a plant, it triggers the production of defense-related chemicals. These make later immune system responses quicker and more efficient, a phenomenon called "priming".
Every tree in a 30 by 30-meter forest stand was connected to every other tree, with an estimated 250 to 300 trees being connected together in this single forest stand.
The fungal Internet exemplifies one of the great lessons of ecology: seemingly separate organisms are often connected, and may depend on each other. "Ecologists have known for some time that organisms are more interconnected and interdependent."  The wood wide web seems to be a crucial part of how these connections form.